Comparison with react-intl
react-intl (Format.js) is popular and widely-used i18n library for React. Lingui is in many ways very similar: both libraries use the same syntax for messages (ICU MessageFormat) and they also have very similar API.
Here's an example from react-intl docs:
<FormattedMessage
id="welcome"
defaultMessage={`Hello {name}, you have {unreadCount, number} {unreadCount, plural,
one {message}
other {messages}
}`}
values={{ name: <b>{name}</b>, unreadCount }}
/>
Looking at the low-level API of Lingui, there isn't much difference:
<Trans
id="welcome"
message={`Hello {name}, you have {unreadCount, number} {unreadCount, plural,
one {message}
other {messages}
}`}
values={{ name: <b>{name}</b>, unreadCount }}
/>
There's really no reason to reinvent the wheel when both libs are build on top of the same message syntax. The story doesn't end here, though.
Translations with rich-text markup
Suppose we have the following text:
<p>Read the <a href="/docs">documentation</a>.</p>
In react-intl, this would be translated as:
<FormattedMessage
id="msg.docs"
defaultMessage="Read the <link>documentation</link>."
values={{
link: (...chunks) => <a href="/docs">{chunks}</a>,
}}
/>
Lingui extends ICU MessageFormat with tags. The example above would be:
<Trans id="msg.docs" message="Read the <link>documentation</link>." components={{ link: <a href="/docs" /> }} />
and the translator gets the message in one piece: Read the <link>documentation</link>
.
However, let's go yet another level deeper.
Macros for component-based message syntax
Lingui provides macros @lingui/macro
which automatically generates a message syntax.
Let's go back to the previous example:
<p>Read the <a href="/docs">documentation</a>.</p>
All we need to do is to wrap the message in a Trans
macro:
<p>
<Trans id="msg.docs">Read the <a href="/docs">documentation</a>.</Trans>
</p>
The macro then parses the Trans
macro children and generates message
and components
props automatically in the form described in the previous section.
This is extremely useful when adding i18n to an existing project. All we need is to wrap all messages in Trans
macro.
Let's compare it with react-intl solution to see the difference:
<p>
<FormattedMessage
id="msg.docs"
defaultMessage="Read the <link>documentation</link>."
values={{
link: (...chunks) => <a href="/docs">{chunks}</a>,
}}
/>
</p>
It' also worth mentioning that the message IDs are completely optional. Lingui is unopinionated in this way and perfectly works with messages as IDs as well:
<p>
<Trans>Read the <a href="/docs">documentation</a>.</Trans>
</p>
The message ID is Read the <0>documentation</0>.
instead of msg.docs
. Both solutions have pros and cons and the library lets you choose the one which works best for you.
Plurals
Another very common linguistic feature is pluralization.
Let's take a look at the original example from react-intl docs:
<FormattedMessage
id="welcome"
defaultMessage={`Hello {name}, you have {unreadCount, number} {unreadCount, plural,
one {message}
other {messages}
}`}
values={{ name: <b>{name}</b>, unreadCount }}
/>
Using Lingui macros, we could combine Trans
, Plural
components and i18n.number
macro:
<Trans id="welcome">
Hello <b>{name}</b>, you have {i18n.number(unreadCount)} <Plural one="message" other="messages" />
</Trans>
and the final message would be very similar:
<Trans
id="welcome"
message={`Hello <0>{name}</0>, you have {unreadCount, number} {unreadCount, plural,
one {message}
other {messages}
}`}
values={{ name, unreadCount }}
/>
The only difference is the <0>
tag included in the message, as LinguiJS can handle components in both variables and the message itself.
It's good to mention here that this isn't the best example of using plurals. Make your translators happy and move plurals to the top of the message:
<Plural
id="welcome"
value={number}
one={
<>
Hello <b>{name}</b>, you have {i18n.number(unreadMessages)} message.
</>
}
other={
<>
Hello <b>{name}</b>, you have {i18n.number(unreadMessages)} messages.
</>
}
/>
Even though both variants are syntactically valid in ICU MessageFormat, the second one is easier for translating, because (again) the translator gets the phrase in one piece.
Text attributes
Components can't be used in some contexts, e.g. to translate text attributes. Whereas react-intl provides JS methods (e.g: formatMessage
) which return plain strings, Lingui offers its core library for such translations. And it also provides macros for these use-cases!
Here are a few short examples:
<a title={i18n._(t`The title of ${name}`)}>{name}</a>
<img alt={i18n._(plural({ value: count, one: "flag", other: "flags" }))} src="..." />
Custom IDs are supported as well:
<a title={i18n._(t("link.title")`The title of ${name}`}>{name}</a>
<img alt={i18n._(plural("img.alt", { value: count, one: "flag", other: "flags" }))} src="..." />
To inject i18n
object into props, you need to use useLingui
hook. It's very similar to useIntl
from react-intl.
External message catalog
Let's say our app has been internationalized and we now want to send the messages to the translator.
react-intl comes with the Babel plugin which extracts messages from individual files, but it's up to you to merge them into one file which you can send to translators.
Lingui provides handy CLI
which extracts messages and merges them with any existing translations. Again, the story doesn't end here.
Compiling messages
The biggest and slowest part of i18n libraries are message parsers and formatters. Lingui compiles messages from MessageFormat syntax into JS functions which only accept values for interpolation (e.g. components, variables, etc). This makes the final bundle smaller and makes the library faster. The compiled catalogs are also bundled with locale data like plurals, so it's not necessary to load them manually.
Summary
- both libraries use the same MessageFormat syntax
- similar API (easy to port from one to the other)
On top of that, Lingui:
- supports rich-text messages
- provides macros to simplify writing messages using MessageFormat syntax
- provides a CLI for extracting and compiling messages
- is very small (3kb gzipped), fast, flexible, and stable
- works for vanilla JS, Next.js, Vue.js, Node.js etc.
- is actively maintained
On the other hand, react-intl:
- is the most popular and used i18n lib in React
- is used in many production websites (stability)
- has lots of resources available online
Discussion
Do you have any comments or questions? Please join the discussion at GitHub or raise an issue. All feedback is welcome!